NAVAL ENGINEER · YACHT DESIGNER

The sea came first.
Engineering followed.

I turn a lifelong passion for boats into design decisions and buildable solutions.

Classic sailing yacht concept designed by Simone Mangieri underway at sea
ORIGIN / YACHT DESIGNCONCEPT TO ENGINEERING

CHAPTER 01 · THE VOYAGE

A passion shaped
into a profession.

The portfolio begins with the reason behind the work: a path through design, naval architecture, research and production engineering.

AGE 10

The nautical path

A fascination with boats became a direction long before it became a profession.

2014

Industrial design

Learning to turn an idea into proportion, geometry and a visual language.

2020

Nautical engineering

Adding hydrostatics, structures and performance to the design process.

2025

MSc research

Using numerical methods to investigate planing hulls and hydrofoil assistance.

NOW

Superyacht production

Connecting three-dimensional design with drawings, systems and buildability.

CHAPTER 02

Selected work

CASE / 001MSc RESEARCHSTATUS / VALIDATED NUMERICAL RUN

HYDROFOIL-ASSISTED STEPPED PLANING HULL

Can foil lift reduce resistance without losing equilibrium?

A custom MATLAB model coupled hull equilibrium, XFOIL data and a robust design search to answer one performance question.

Transverse geometry of two symmetric T-foils beneath a deadrise hull
FIG. 01

Two symmetric T-foils with panel-normal struts.

NUMERICAL COREMATLAB
AIRFOIL POLARSXFOIL
HULL MODELSAVITSKY–BENG
DESIGN SEARCHROBUST OPTIMISATION
View numerical workflow +

METHOD

From geometry to one continuous solution branch.

Candidate equilibria were screened, checked around ten neighbouring states, recentred when needed and followed through speed without jumping between unrelated roots.

Logical workflow from configuration and search to audit and output
FIG. 02

Numerical workflow

01 · PERFORMANCE

The curve tells the story.

Foil-assisted resistance stays nearly constant across the accepted speed range while bare-hull resistance continues to rise.

Resistance and equilibrium trim comparison across the strict speed branch
FIG. 03

Resistance and trim along the continuous strict branch.

RESISTANCE64.91 → 56.49N / bare hull to hull + foil
RESISTANCE REDUCTION−12.97%predicted total resistance at the 6 m/s design condition

02 · ADJUSTABLE INCIDENCE

Fixed geometry.
Variable response.

The NACA 2412 terminal wing rotates about its quarter-chord pivot. Incidence decreases with speed to control lift while preserving the same equilibrium branch.

DESIGN POINT / 6.0 m/s3.369° + 1.250° = 4.619°trim + mechanical incidence = model angle of attack
NACA 2412 terminal wing rotating about its quarter-chord pivot at the 6 metre per second design condition
CONTROL DETAIL

Quarter-chord pivot and incidence reference at the design condition.

DESIGN POINT / 6.0 m/s3.369° + 1.250° = 4.619°trim + mechanical incidence = model angle of attack
Mechanical implementation +

The numerical schedule defines the required motion. Actuator and hinge loads, positive locking, backlash, sealing, corrosion and a fail-safe position require mechanical validation.

03 · WHY IT WORKS

Less wetted hull, not free lift.

Foil lift and bow-up moment unload the hull. The resulting reduction in wetted area more than offsets the foil's own drag.

Bare-hull and foil-assisted wetted planforms at 6 metres per second
FIG. 04

Wetted planform comparison at the design condition.

WETTED AREA−37.3%0.6529 → 0.4092 m²
Technical validation & model limits+
Independent vertical force and pitching moment audit at 6 metres per second
FIG. 05

Independent audit of force and moment contributions.

FOIL LIFT SHARE32.15%of total weight

WHAT THE RESULT MEANS

The selected state passes equilibrium, geometry and local robustness checks. It remains a preliminary quasi-static result—not CFD, structural verification or performance certification.

NEXT VALIDATION

Free-surface CFD, structural and ventilation assessment, followed by model or prototype testing.

THE TAKEAWAY

Model the physics. Challenge the result. Turn analysis into a design decision.

CASE / 002BSc THESIS2020 / INTEGRATED YACHT DESIGN
Three-quarter bow render of the 19.6 metre aluminium sailing yacht

19.6 M ALUMINIUM SAILING YACHT

Classic lines.
Contemporary engineering.

An ocean-going sailing yacht developed as an integrated whole—from arrangement and aluminium structure to onboard systems, propulsion and stability.

3D MODELLINGRHINOCEROS
VISUALISATIONKEYSHOT
RULE-BASED CALCULATIONSEXCEL
STABILITY STUDYMAXSURF

01 · DESIGN BRIEF & LIFE ABOARD

Not a retro yacht.
A modern yacht with a memory.

Classic character reinterpreted for contemporary long-range cruising, with exterior form, interior volume and technical access developed together.

CLASSIC DNA
  • Pronounced stern overhangStern overhang
  • Central helm stationCentral helm
  • Traditional deckhouse proportionsTraditional deckhouse
  • Round side portholesRound portholes
MODERN RESPONSE
  • Retractable lifting keelLifting keel
  • Square-top mainsailSquare-top mainsail
  • Flush-deck integrationFlush deck
  • Accessible onboard systemsService access
Deck and interior plans of the 19.6 metre sailing yachtProfile and sail plan of the 19.6 metre sailing yacht
LOA19.60 m
FULL-LOAD DISPLACEMENT21.20 t
HULL MATERIALEN 5083aluminium alloy
VARIABLE DRAFT3.00—4.15 mlifting keel raised / lowered

02 · STRUCTURAL LOGIC

Structure becomes architecture.

EN 5083 scantlings were sized to ISO 12215-5 and coordinated with the lifting keel, machinery and interior.

RULE-BASED SCANTLINGSWELDED CONSTRUCTION BLOCKSMAINTAINABLE ACCESS
Exploded transparent view of the sailing yacht aluminium structure
RULE-BASED SCANTLINGSWELDED CONSTRUCTION BLOCKSMAINTAINABLE ACCESS

03 · ENGINEERING THE WHOLE

One yacht. One connected system.

Systems, propulsion and stability were developed as one coordinated design.

Cockpit and central helm render of the sailing yacht
THE TAKEAWAY

From silhouette to stability, one complete yacht proposal.

CASE / 003SELECTED ACADEMIC STUDIES · ANALOGUE STUDIOMETHOD / GRAPHITE ON PAPER

DESIGN FOUNDATIONS

Drawn to
understand.

Before CAD, drawing taught me to understand form, space, construction and propulsion.

FORMSPACESYSTEMS
Hand-drawn longitudinal section studying the internal arrangement of a motorboat
01 / SPACE IN SECTION

Accommodation, access and machinery resolved in section.

01 · SPACE IN SECTION

A section explains what a silhouette cannot.

Section drawing reveals how people, spaces and machinery shape the hull.

02 · CONSTRUCTION & TRADITION

Learning the boat through the way it is built.

A traditional gozzo study connects hull form with frames, keel and planking.

Hand-drawn traditional gozzo study with profile, section, plan and construction perspective
02 / CONSTRUCTION & TRADITION

Hull form and construction studied as one system.

Hand-drawn comparison of outboard, inboard, IPS, V-drive, sail-drive and surface-drive systems
03 / SYSTEM COMPARISON

Six propulsion layouts compared through installation sketches.

03 · PROPULSION ARCHITECTURES

Every propulsion choice reshapes the boat around it.

Comparative sketches show how propulsion choices reshape machinery space, structure and underwater geometry.

THE TAKEAWAY

Draw first. Understand the system. Then model.

Portrait of Simone Mangieri
SIMONE MANGIERI

PROFILE / SIMONE MANGIERI

Design intent.
Engineering rigour.
Built reality.

Portrait of Simone Mangieri

Naval engineer and yacht designer bridging concept, numerical analysis and production. Based in La Spezia, Italy.

Naval architecture3D modellingHydrodynamicsProduction engineeringTechnical communication
HAVE A PROJECT, ROLE OR IDEA?

Let's make it
work in reality.

mangierisimone@outlook.com